WE SOLICIT THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION

Federal Case # 3:06 cv 95 Appellate Case # 09-12234-CC Supreme Court Case #: Undetermined

After attempting all possible steps in resolving this issue amicably so far, the lead plaintiff , being of an honorable behavior as was recognized in many ways during the proceedings, found it necessary to engage the court of public opinion in such an unprecedented case. This blog will be the first in a series. We invite the public at large to follow closely as this very same thing can happen to you.

Interviewer: Where have you gone with your case so far?

African American Lead Plaintiff: I wrote to the White house, I wrote to the Attorney General, I wrote letters to four congressmen, I wrote a letter to the FBI, I wrote and petitioned the HUD, I sued the county's agent and the commissioners who should have ben supervising her and I sued the co-conspirators also to no vail.

This case involves an African American real estate developer, the lead plaintiff in the case Mr. Sony Roy individually, and Mr. Sony Roy and Mrs. Raymonde L. Roy as a married couple, facing an unprecedented case such as never happened before in America. Never before had any County in the US caused any citizen to loose more than $15 Million with impunity in a historically racially segregated area. Never before had a lower court made undisputed oversight and granted summary judgement to those who caused the harm in a historically racially segregated area. Never before Had an Appellate court of the United States found wrongs in a case contrary to the lower court and failed to reverse the lower court's decision in a case located in a historically racially segregated area. To lead Plaintiff's understanding undue hardship is recognized by The Supreme Court of the United States as a cause for undue delays and late filing which sometimes are favorable to the party suffering from those hardships. In this case it was not, and, that was unfortunate. Never before had procedural issues become the determining factor in an unprecedented case to Lead Plaintiff's recollection.

Interviewer: Where did the case take place?

African American Lead Plaintiff: This case took place on the Gulf of Mexico in the Northern part of Florida, in a historically racially segregated area of the Walton County.

Interviewer: Who did you sue?

African American Lead Plaintiff: e sued the Walton County's agent, the Commissioners, and the co-conspirators as we discovered.

Interviewer: So this case involved a Government, is that right?

African American Lead Plaintiff: Yes. The case involves a minor Government using abusive and contradictory statements to obtain political immunity in the face of Estoppel violations and Unfortunate Confusions as found by the 11 Circuit Appellate court.

Interviewer: Did you say that this case took place in a segregated area?

African American Lead Plaintiff: Yes Sir I did. This case took place in a historically racially segregated area of the Walton County according to the Honorable Judge at Federal court, the US Census Bureau and one neighbor who told the lead plaintiff on or about December 2003 immediately after the purchase of raw land by the lead plaintiff "That another African American came to work for her as a gardner one year prior, and the other neighbors called the police on him."

Interviewer: Was that explained to the Appellate court?

African American Lead Plaintiff: It was well-laid out in the brief and the subsequent briefs and motion specially the motion for rehearing very clearly, which was denied after the court granted only 15 minutes of Oral argument to the lead Plaintiff.